Feminist Leslee Udwin murders innocent person for being both Indian and male

Another victim of Leslie Udwin’s brutal vendetta against Indian men:

Nagaland government has conveyed to the Centre that Syed Sarif Khan, who was lynched by a mob in Dimapur last week, did not rape the girl who accused him of assaulting her but they had consensual sex twice. (source: the shillong times)

Is the close proximity to the date of the release of BBC’s Leslie Udwin’s crappy film, India’s daughter, a mere coincidence? I don’t think so. The murderers who murdered this innocent person, hurling racist slurs (of being an illegal Bangladeshi immigrant, while he was actually an Indian from Assam) at him, weren’t uneducated, illiterate, or economically poor people, but teachers, and other educated folks.

Let’s see the story.

A random stranger, a woman, follows Khan into a hotel, and claims she’s willing to have intercourse with him for a sum of 5000 rupees. They do so, twice, and then this woman demands a sum of 5 lakh rupees, threatening to file a case of rape should he not comply. He refuses, and she, keeping to her “promise”, files a rape charge against him. He is imprisoned for this. One fine day, a mob bursts into the jail, grabs him, and drags him 7 kilometres from the spot, where he is accused of being an illegal Bangladeshi immigrant, stripped, beaten up, his scrotum cut open, castrated, and shredded to death. A few days later, he’s found to be innocent. There is no case filed against the woman.

Now, swap their genders. There would be millions of feminist blockheads across the world, screaming, blocking random streets and disrupting their nations’ economy for no particular reason, and 7 billion agitated people.

Is this the world that feminists wish to create? A world with no rule of law; a world where men are treated like slaves and discriminated against for their gender, serving women; a world where a sexist apartheid is clapped for by more than half the population?

Thanks Leslee Udwin.


This is why I detest feminism

I’m all for battling sexism. But feminists aren’t. Most feminists are sickening idiots who would like to promote sexism against men. Most feminists believe in sexual abuse of children, and are pro-rape, as long as the victims are male. They’re the people who cry over the dishonest claim of 20% lower wages for women, but wholeheartedly support men having 80% lower wages than women de facto, by having to spend for their family.

This is the criminal who bribed a rapist, his lawyers and the guards of a Delhi jail to get an interview which could potentially prevent him from getting a death sentence. Sick racist and sexist, calls 600 million people “sick” – double negative, check!
Ooh, so it looks like Kuwait’s lecturing us on women’s rights?
[TWO IMAGES HAVE DISAPPEARED, APOLOGIES] The image in the tweet, I mean. This is a well-educated professor of biochemistry in Germany, who has a doctoral degree in her field speaking.
This is not the first time that this same professor, Annette G. Beck-Sickinger has revealed her sexist, racist nature. And oh, no action has been taken against her by the university. Had the genders been reversed, and perhaps the nationality too, this would be an entirely different matter, with feminist groups all over the world screaming and blocking random streets for no reason.

I oppose proposal to make rape laws gender-neutral. We had opposed it when the government made child rape laws gender-neutral. After the feminist wave of the 1980s, many countries in the West made rape laws gender-neutral. But, they have realized these laws are harming women more than men. There is physicality in the definition of rape, there is use of power and the victim has a stigma attached to her. If made gender-neutral, rape laws will not have the deterrence value and it will make it more complicated for judges in court. – Flavia Agnes

So this feminist, and a very prominent one here in India, explicitly admits that their intention is to harm men, rather than achieve gender equality (by opportunity), or even to benefit women. She also explicitly reveals her pro-rape stance, as long as the victim is male, and that she spares not even children from her pro-rape views.

Here’s what Vrinda Gover, another prominent Indian feminist has to say about this issue:

Why should rape laws be gender-neutral? That would be making a mockery of what is actually happening in the country. There are no instances of women raping men. I don’t think men are facing serious sexual violence as women. Consider the brutality and intensity of sexual violence against women. Hope the home minister does not put out a bill that delays or obfuscates discussions on the issue

Obviously, providing justice to all rape victims, without discriminating by gender, is a “mockery”. Well, yeah it is, of her sexist crap.

Dear BBC, are you endorsing rape?

Dear BBC,

I seek clarification regarding your film, India’s daughter. Let’s make this clear, are you endorsing rape?

Yes, the Delhi state government and police did a bad mess-up and let you interview a rapist and murderer, and shame on them for that! But your actions could lead to a rapist going away scott-free, with tons of money, and spread propaganda in favour of rape.

You bribed a rapist Rs 40,000 to give you some psychopathic statements, statements which even such a disgusting criminal asshole of a shithead would not believe in, so as to support your shitty propaganda against India (there are a ton of racist, anti-Indian articles on your website, enough said), portraying every single one of 600,000,000 Indian males as a perverted rapist sexist psychopath. Let’s make this clear. You paid a rapist. You incentivised rape. You are hurting India’s daughter, not the 600,000,000 Indian males, a lot of whom areperfectly sane, respectful and rational. You are raping India’s daughter.

I bet you know, that by making someone, who wasn’t directly the rapist, but involved in the crime and a witness to it, confess the crime, in public, in an extra-judicial setting, without the presence of his lawyer, you are permitting the rapists themselves to cry that they weren’t given a free trial, so that no death penalty could be awarded, and in effect, they could go scott-free. You are hurting India’s daughter. You are raping India’s daughter.

Your director left India before the film was released, to save his shitty skin. You clearly saw that the victim’s parents protested against the publication of the video. You are hurting India’s daughter. You are raping India’s daughter.

Oh, and did you know?! The per-capita rape  rate of  the U.K. is a whopping 14 times that of India’s. And don’t even talk about under-reporting. 60% of rapes go unreported in the U.K. Your conviction rate? 7%. Ours is thrice of that. 97000 people are raped in your country, every year, and that’s just what’s reported. 85000 are women, 12000 are men. Under-reporting is much worse among men than among women. 5% of women under 60 have been raped, and 0.85% of men. If you go by the reports.

It’s pretty obvious, that you endorse rape, sexism against women, sexism against men, racism against Indians, and so on. Ooh, and look who’s teaching us about women’s rights:

Kuwait Times teaches India women's rights?
Kuwait is obviously the world leader in women’s rights.

Your pathetic journalism is harming the lives and careers of innocents.